New Diet Myth in the Making

New Diet Myth in the Making

The government has released the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. It’s the official word on how we should eat. In time, it’ll form the basis of the next Food Pyramid. And doctors will use it to advise their patients on diet and health.

It’s been 20 years since the first Food Pyramid was “built” by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That pyramid used carbs as its wide base and cut fats to a minimum.

But a lot has changed since then: twenty years of scientific studies and research says that carbs promote obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. And there’s plenty of evidence to suggest healthy protein and fats are the key to wellness.

So do the new guidelines reflect this research? We’ll find out in a moment.

Rise of Low-Fat Diets

Since the late 1970s we’ve been following a government-promoted low-fat plan… One that cuts protein and fat and replaces them with grains.

While we’ve followed this plan, obesity levels have skyrocketed. We’ve also seen massive increases in diabetes and heart disease.

Pioneers like Dr. Robert Atkins linked high-carb diets to obesity. They championed weight-loss through low-carb diets.

This was initially dismissed as “quack” therapy. But over the next 20 years, study after study backed up the science behind the theory. Notably, that lean protein and healthy fats are vital to good health. And grains are the quickest route to obesity and disease.

In 2005, the Institute of Medicine Macronutrient Report concluded:

“High-carb diets modify the metabolic profile [causing] heart disease (CHD) and diabetes.”

A second study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. It compared four different diets for health and weight-loss benefits. After 12 months, researchers found that low-carb diets yielded better weight loss results. They also lowered blood triglycerides.

A third study was conducted by Harvard researchers. It followed the dietary habits of 80,000 women over 20 years. The study looked at how grains affect the heart. It revealed that low-carb diets cut heart disease risk by 30 percent.

These are just three out of dozens of studies that show low-carb diets control weight and improve health.

And yet the new Guidelines completely ignore these and many other studies. Instead, the report says that “adults should consume 45-65 percent of their total calories from carbs.”

It also says we should eat a “plant-based” diet. And consume “only moderate amounts of lean meats, poultry, and eggs.”

Which means the official word on health remains largely the same: eat plenty of grains and keep your protein and fat intake low.

Response to New Guidelines

The Guidelines have been reviewed by the scientific community. Many scientists note that we’ve tried this low-fat, high-carb experiment before… and it’s failed.

This way of eating is responsible for “an unanticipated epidemic of obesity and diabetes,” says Dr. Michael Alderman, a distinguished professor with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY.

Plenty of experts agree with him. One of these experts is Professor Richard Feinman, a professor of Biochemistry at SUNY Downstate Medical Center. He is also the president of the prestigious Nutrition and Metabolism Society.

Prof. Feinman teamed up with five other notable researchers and scientists to review the Guidelines. Their review is in this month’s edition of Nutrition.

In a nutshell, the review says the Guidelines were produced “in the face of contradictory evidence.”

“Concerns that were raised with the first dietary recommendations have yet to be addressed,” says Prof. Feinman. “The initial Dietary Goals proposed increases in carb intake and decreases in saturated fat.”

He notes that these goals “are carried further in the 2010 Guidelines. These remain unproven. Yet a dietary shift in this direction has already taken place. Even as obesity and diabetes have increased.”

The review goes on to call the Guidelines “critically weak,” offering “an incomplete body of relevant science.”

Prof. Feinman points to dozens of celebrated studies showing the dangers of carbs. Which the Guidelines omitted. In other areas, the Guidelines ignore the results of referenced studies.

For example, the Guidelines reference reviewing 36 studies published since 2004. It states that 20 of those studies show no clear benefits in weight loss between low-carb or low-fat diets. But it ignores the fact that the other 16 studies clearly showed that low-carb diets gained better weight loss results than low-fat ones.

Prof. Feinman’s review concludes that the Guidelines employ “incomplete science” and “inaccurately represent” scientific studies. Further, it states that the Guidelines “draw conclusions” and “make recommendations” that “do not reflect the science.”

How You Can Stay Healthy

“It is time to reexamine how US dietary guidelines are created,” says Prof. Feinman.

But that won’t happen anytime soon. These Guidelines represent the government’s recommendation on diet and health. Newspapers and magazines will promote the advice. And they will be taken as gospel. In time the Guidelines will serve as basis for the new Food Pyramid.

But that doesn’t mean you have to turn your back on your own health. Long time readers will know we’ve been promoting low-carb, high-protein diets – rich in healthy fats – for many years.

You can read more about eating a diet that promotes weight loss and good health right here. Or sign up to get a full report on balancing protein, fat, and carbs in our in-depth health advisory newsletter, Natural Health Dossier.

As part of this advisory newsletter, we issued a health research report that breaks down the secrets behind the macronutrients: the vital amino acids in protein that are essential to good health. This report also lays out the healthy fats that you need to strengthen your heart. And explains why carbs are so destructive to your metabolism, hormones, and general health.

Best of all, we outline essential foods that you should be eating. And the diet you need to stick to. Sign up for the thoroughly-researched Natural Health Dossier newsletter right here.

To your health,
Ian's signature
Ian Robinson, Managing Editor, NHD “Health Watch”

Related Articles:

Health Topic: Diet and Nutrition


  1. C Taylor says:

    The government has a financial interest in keeping us sick and dying young.
    Consider – a man who dies of a heart attack at 70 has only received five years of Social Security and perhaps one or two expensive hospitalizations on Medicare. On the other hand, my slim, fit and healthy (at 65) father lived to be 95, and received 30 years of Social Security, an artificial hip, heart bypass(at 70+), gall bladder removal, aneurism repair,had pneumonia (twice), spinal surgery, ongoing non-surgical treatment of prostate cancer, repair and rehab for a broken femur, and emergency room visits after several falls, all at government expense.

    The only problem is to devise a diet that will leave enough young people healthy enough to serve in the military for their stupid wars before they die without costing SS and Medicare too much money if they survice the wars.

  2. Wallach says:

    This is a cool blog message, I will keep this idea in my mind. If you add more video and pictures because it helps understanding :) ml Wallach.

  3. I want to post quick hello and want to say appriciate for this good article.Good site anyway.

  4. Matthew says:

    If the government was truly “for the people” then the food pyramid or whatever contraption they come up with should be done truly independently of any government entity or business interest.

    You have some great articles on high fructose corn syrup – soon to be called by the seemingly innocent name of corn sugar. Another major health risk imposed on the public by a government “protecting its corn farmers” instead of worrying about the health costs of HFCS.

    Dr. Andrew Weil and many others have shown that diets rich in natural, unprocessed foods are the best way to stay healthy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *